Demolition by Neglect
Statesville Historic Preservation Commission



Demolition

Demolition of a structure in a historic district must be approved by Statesville City Council. The applicant must first submit an application for review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Based on the application the Commission will submit a recommendation to City Council. City Council will then render a decision on the request for demolition.



Demolition By Neglect

In March of 2003 the City Council adopted Statesville's Demolition By Neglect ordinance. This tool provides a means for the HPC to identify and help stabilize endangered historic properties.

ORDINANCE NO. _7-03___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (ZONING), ARTICLE V, SECTION 50.3 (HISTORIC PROPERTIES) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF STATESVILLE BY ADDING NEW SECTIONS 50.3.13 B 50.3.19 (DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT).
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Statesville desires to amend the Historic Properties Section previously adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Statesville that Appendix A (Zoning), Article 1, Section 50.3 be amended by adding Sections 50.3.13 B 50.3.19 (Demolition by Neglect) as follows:
Sec. 50.3.13  Standards.
The exterior features of any building or structure (including walls, fences, light fixtures, steps, pavement, paths, or any other appurtenant feature), or any type of outdoor advertising sign either designated as an Historic Landmark or located within a designated local historic district shall be preserved by the owner or such other person who may have legal possession, custody and control thereof against decay and deterioration and keep free from structural defects.  The owner, or other person having such legal possession, custody and control, shall upon written request by the City repair such exterior features if they are found to be deteriorating, or if their condition is contributing to deterioration, including but not limited to any of the following defects which have the effect of significantly impairing the integrity of such building or structure or the special character of such historic district:
(a) Deterioration of exterior walls, foundations, or other vertical support that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
(b) Deterioration of flooring or floor supports, roofs, or other horizontal members that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
(c) Deterioration of external chimneys that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
(d) Deterioration or crumbling of exterior plasters or mortars.
(e) Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, and foundations, including broken windows or doors.
(f) Defective protection or lack of weather protection for exterior walls and roof coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering.
(g) Rotting, holes, and other forms of decay.
(h) Deterioration of exterior stairs, porches, handrails, window and door frames, cornices, entablatures, wall facings, and architectural details that causes delamination, instability, loss of shape and form, or crumbling.
(i) Heaving, subsidence, or cracking of foundations, sidewalks, steps, or pathways.
(j) Deterioration of fences, gates, and accessory structures.
(k) Deterioration of any exterior feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe conditions to life, health, or other property.
Sec. 50.3.14.  Petition and Action.
The Historic Preservation Commission may file a petition listing specific defects with the Director of Planning or his designee requesting that Director of Planning or his designee under the following procedures require the correction of deterioration or making of repairs to any historic landmark or structure located within a local historic district so that such structure shall be preserved and protected in accordance with the purposes of Section 50.3.2 of this Code.
 
(l) Whenever a petition is filed with the Director of Planning or his designee charging that a structure is undergoing demolition by neglect, the Director of Planning or his designee shall, if the Director of Planning or his designee's preliminary investigation discloses a basis for such charges, within seven days issue and cause to be served upon the owner and/or such other person who may have legal possession, custody, and control thereof, as the same may be determined by reasonable diligence, a complaint stating the charges in that respect and containing a notice that a hearing will be held before the Director of Planning or his designee not less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the serving of such complaints; that the owner and/or parties in interest shall be given a right to answer to give testimony at the place and time fixed in the complaint; that the Commission shall also be given notice of the hearing and that the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity shall not be controlling in hearings before the Director of Planning or his designee.  The purpose of the hearing is to receive evidence concerning the charge of deterioration and to ascertain whether the owner and/or other parties in interest wishes to petition the Commission for a claim of undue economic hardship.
(m) If after such notice and hearing, the Director of Planning or his designee determines that the structure is undergoing demolition by neglect because it is deteriorating, or if its condition is contributing to deterioration, according to the standards of Section 50.3.13, the Director of Planning or his designee shall state in writing the findings of fact in support of such determination and shall issue and cause to be served upon the owner and/or other parties in interest therein an order to repair within the time specified those elements of the structure that are deteriorating, contributing to deterioration, or deteriorated.  In the event that the owner and/or other parties in interest wish to petition for a claim of undue economic hardship, the Director of Planning or his designee's order shall be stayed until after the Commission=s determination in accordance with the procedures of Section 50.3.16.
Sec. 50.3.15.  Methods of Service.
Complaints or order issued by the Director of Planning or his designee shall be served upon persons either personally or by registered or certified mail; but if the whereabouts of such persons are unknown and the same cannot be ascertained by the Director of Planning or his designee in the exercise of reasonable diligence, and the Director of Planning or his designee shall make an affidavit to that effect, stating the steps taken to determine and locate the persons in interest, then the serving of such complaint or order may be made by publishing the same once each week for two successive weeks in a newspaper generally circulated within the City.  Where such service is by publication, a notice of the pending proceedings shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises thereby affected.
Sec. 50.3.16.  Safeguards From Undue Economic Hardship.
(n) When a claim of undue economic hardship is made owing to the effects of this Article, the Director of Planning or his designee shall notify the Commission within ten days following the hearing on the complaint.  The Commission shall schedule a hearing on the claim at its next regular meeting, within the limitations of its procedures for application deadlines.
The petitioner shall present the information provided under subsection (b) to the Commission.  The Commission may require that an owner and/or parties in interest furnish such additional information that is relevant to its determination of undue economic hardship.  The Commission may direct its staff to furnish additional information, as the commission believes is relevant.  The Commission shall also state which form of financial proof it deems relevant and necessary to a particular case.
(o) When a claim of undue economic hardship is made owing to the effects of this Article, the owner and/or parties in interest must provide evidence during the hearing upon the claim, describing the circumstances of hardship.  The minimum evidence may include any of the following:
3. Nature of ownership (individual, business, or non-profit) or legal possession, custody, and control.
4. Financial resources of the owner and/or parties in interest.
5. Cost of repairs.
6. Assessed value of the land and improvements.
7. Real estate taxes for the previous two years.
 
8. Amounts paid for the property, date of purchase, and party from whom purchased, including a description of the relationship between the owner and the person from whom the property was purchased, or other means of acquisition of title, such as by gift or inheritance.
9. Annual debt service, if any, for previous two years.
10. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked, and offers received, if any.
In addition for income producing property:
11. Annual gross income from the property for the previous two years.
12. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous two years, including proof that adequate and competent management practices were followed.
13. Annual cash flow, if any, for the previous two years.
14. The past year's income tax returns.
(p) Within 60 days of the Commission=s hearing on the claim, the Commission shall cause to be made a finding of undue or no undue economic hardship and shall enter the reasons for such finding into the record.  In the event of a finding of no undue economic hardship, the Commission shall report such finding to the Director of Planning or his designee, and the Director of Planning or his designee shall cause to be issued an order for such property to be repaired within the time specified.
(q) In the event of a finding of undue economic hardship, the finding shall be accompanied by a recommended plan to relieve the economic hardship.  This plan may include, but is not limited to, property tax relief as may be allowed under North Carolina law, loans or grants from the City, or other public, private or nonprofit sources, acquisition by purchase or eminent domain, building code modifications, changes in applicable zoning regulations, or relaxation of the provisions of the Article sufficient to mitigate the undue economic hardship.  The Commission shall report such finding and plan to the Director of Planning or his designee.  The Director of Planning or his designee shall cause to be issued an order for such property to be repaired within the time specified and according to the provisions of the recommended plan.
Sec. 50.3.17.  Appeals.
Findings made by the Director of Planning, his designee or by the Commission may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment.  To perfect such an appeal, application must be filed by an aggrieved party with the Board of Adjustment within thirty days following receipt of the order for repair of the property or determination.  Appeals shall be in the nature of certiorari.
Sec. 50.3.18.  Other City Powers.
Nothing contained within this Article shall diminish the City=s power to declare a building unsafe or violation of the minimum housing code.
Sec. 50.3.19.  Penalties and Remedies.
Enforcement of this Article may be by any one or more of the following methods, and the institution of any action under any of these methods shall not relieve any party from any other civil or criminal proceeding prescribed for violations and prohibitions.
 Equitable Remedy.  The City may apply for any appropriate equitable remedy to enforce the provisions of this Article.
 Order of Abatement.  The City may apply for and the court may enter an order of abatement.  An order of abatement may direct that improvements or repairs be made, or that any other action be taken that is necessary to bring the property into compliance with this Article.  In the event the City executes an order of abatement, the City shall have a lien, in the nature of a mechanic=s and materialman=s, on the property for the cost of executing such order.
 
 Civil Penalty.  No civil penalty shall be levied unless and until the Director of Planning shall deliver a written notice by personal service or by registered mail or by certified, return receipt requested, to the person responsible for each violation indicating the nature of the violation and ordering corrective action.  The notice shall also set forth the time period when corrective measures must be completed.  The notice shall state that failure to correct the violation within the specified period will result in the assessment of civil penalties and other enforcement action.  If after the allotted time period has expired and after the hearing of an appeal if any by the Board of Adjustment, corrective action has not been completed, a civil penalty shall be assessed in accordance with city code.
This ordinance was introduced for the first reading by Councilmember Kutteh, seconded by Councilmember Steele, and unanimously carried on the   3  day of March, 2003.
Ayes: Kutteh, Steele, Johnson, Peterson, Raymer, Matthews, Huggins, Lawton
Nayes:
The second and final reading of this ordinance was heard on the   17 day of March, 2003, and upon motion of Councilmember Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Raymer,  and unanimously carrier, was adopted.
Ayes: Lawton, Huggins, Matthews, Raymer, Johnson, Peterson, Steele
Nayes:
This ordinance is to be in full force and effect from and after 18 day of   March, 2003.
 
 
           John E. Marshall
                 Mayor
    APPROVED AS TO FORM
    By: Eddie Gaines
                    City Attorney
 
 
ATTEST:
   Mary L. Craddock
               City Clerk
 

Home